Changing the culture in science
In the UK, women represent only 21% of physics undergraduates and 9.1% of engineering undergraduates (McWhinnie 2012; Equality Challenge Unit 2014). Even in subjects such as chemistry and biological sciences, where women predominate at undergraduate level, the proportion of women in research and academic posts progressively diminishes.
During the 2012/13 academic year the majority of UK professors, across all academic disciplines, were men (78.3%). This gender difference was most notable among full-time professors working in Science, Engineering and Technology (SET) subject areas, where 82.8% were men [Equality Challenge Unit, 2014]. In medicine women are under-represented as academics and in their aspirations to hold an academic post [Lambert, Smith & Goldacre, 2015].
Some of the women we interviewed, who were mainly senior academics, recalled discrimination they had faced earlier in their careers.
Elspeth, who did a doctorate (DPhil) in nuclear physics, found it was tough working in a ‘man’s world’. Later she moved to molecular biophysics, where she worked for a highly respected female head of department.
Until the 1970s all Oxford colleges were single sex, the majority restricting their undergraduate population to men, and when Elspeth became the maths tutor for physics students at an all-male college she faced ‘huge discrimination’ and ‘very severe ostracism’. Other women we interviewed recalled discrimination on grounds of gender too. One remembered an occasion in her lab when a colleague was asked to resign because she was pregnant. Another woman recalled an incident when the male head of her laboratory told a colleague that she was not serious about her career in science because she had children.
Today, in 2015, although most senior academics are still male, the situation for women seems to be improving. Indeed, some of the women we interviewed said that they had never been aware of any discrimination due to gender.
When Helen M was at school her maths teacher thought she should be a housewife and didn’t want to teach her maths, but since her school days she hasn’t felt that being a woman has been a disadvantage.
Although caring responsibilities can impact on career progression, some women said that they wanted to take main responsibility for their children, even if it meant that their training took longer, or their career started more slowly. Others had partners who shared child care, or had found good solutions to child care, but recognised that time spent on child care is often a barrier to other women’s success. Lois, who worked as a career coach, explained why caring responsibilities make life hard for some women, especially for women in academic medicine (For more see ‘Child care’).
Among the women we talked to Sally was the only woman who had taken a long career break to care for her children (For more see ‘Child care’ and ‘When is the best time to have children?’). She reflected on how having children may affect a woman’s career at the crucial point after their postdoc. Fran, who only took six months maternity leave and who had not experienced overt discrimination herself, also explained why women who stop work for a while are disadvantaged.
Fran believes that women who have a career break are disadvantaged because they are not up to date on the literature and techniques have moved on. She thinks that people who have children need support.
Several women, including professors, said that in the University there is still a lack of transparency about appointments, progression and how people are selected for committees. Some suggested that there is still an ‘old boys’ network’ and that major decisions are still made in the corridor or in the pub, and that there is unconscious bias which makes it hard for women to succeed.
Sexism and sexual stereotyping
Although culture in the work place and at home appears to be slowly changing, more change is needed if women are to have equal opportunities (For more see ‘Athena SWAN’). Alison W commented that if her male colleagues work late or attend a conference they get sympathy from their families, but when her female colleagues work late their family members make them feel that they are either selfish or that they are ‘betraying’ the family.
Sexual stereotyping still goes on too. For example, Bryony said that other people did not expect her to be a scientist because she is tall and blond. Others experienced stereotyping because of the type of work they did.
One woman thought that being a young woman worked to her advantage. She said that, ‘Sometimes situations with certain people are easier to smooth over if you’re a young woman than they would be otherwise, and in that sense I suppose there’s a certain element of stereotyping.’ But others noted that stereotyping had a negative effect.
Marian said that because she is a successful senior academic other people sometimes assume she doesn’t have children. Lois, a hospital consultant, thinks that male colleagues sometimes treat her in a patronising manner, and that they show her less respect than they would to a male colleague. Another woman said that when she goes to a conference other delegates always assume that her male colleagues are leading the work, which is annoying.
Equality Challenge Unit (2014) Equality in higher education: statistical report 2014. London
Lambet T, Smith F, Goldacre M. (2015) Doctors currently in jobs with academic content and their future intentions to pursue clinical academic careers: questionnaire surveys. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Open 6 (2) 1-8.
McWhinnie S. (2012) Physics students in UK Higher Education Institutions. Institute of Physics